Wednesday, March 14, 2018

The Brutal Cultural War Against Your Free Speech

ALEX JONES, ALEX JONES, ALEX JONES, is being villainized majorly by the ENEMY-MSM ...

Wednesday yowls and roars, precious and proud KitKats ... Yes, right now, the infamous Alex Jones is front and center in this ORWELLIAN-GASLIGHTING-1984-FASCIST-MAFIA attack ... the naked truth is: if Alex falls WE ALL FALL before these nazi-commie killers ... currently he and others are being endlessly, viciously charged by the little cowardly minions of the murdering evil globalists ... for what? DARING TO TELL THE TRUTH THE BEST HE CAN ... the best we all can who are in this battle to save ourselves, and to save humanity ... yet, to accomplish that, to save our future, know that having-exercising FREE SPEECH is the key ... FOR, TRUTH IS ALWAYS THE KEY ...

And now, the poor misguided parents of Seth Rich are suing Fox News for *wait for it* having the cahonies to actually investigate Seth's very suspicious death. In this Big Cat's opinion, Seth Rich is a TRUE AMERICAN HERO ... everything points to Seth Rich whistleblowing to Julian Assange about the fact that Hitlary Rotten Clintonista STOLE the democratic candidacy for president from Bernie Sanders ... the word is right now [true or not] that the sinister Debbie Washerman Schultz had Seth murdered ... gawd knows who actually ordered the HIT ... but a HIT it was ... FOX and anyone else has the ***right*** to investigate  the death of Seth Rich, especially in the extraordinary circumstances ... the Kougar is truly sorry for Seth's parents loss ... she really is, especially given her own devastating losses of loved ones ... that said, how is suing FOX going to really help them heal, in the long run of life??? 'Course, there is the lure of money, and grief is often a very fierce emotion. To be candid, the Kougar has NEVER gotten over some of her lost loved ones, and she NEVER will... that's just the truth of it. However, she doesn't want to inflict her grief on those who do not deserve it, and had nothing to do with causing it.

Yes, as the KOUGAR has yowled often, she is a FREE SPEECH girl, and has always been one since early childhood.


BREAKING! DEMS SAY REPEAL THE FIRST AMENDMENT

Free speech is under full scale attack

SOLAR STORMS WILL CONTINUE DURING 2018 AND INTO 2019... PREPARE... 

Massive solar storm that will slam Earth TOMORROW could knock out power supplies, damage satellites and trigger stunning auroras

  • Nasa spotted a solar flare releasing a coronal mass ejection earlier this week
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration issued a 'G1' storm watch
  • It coincides with the formation of 'equinox cracks' in the sun, which form around the equinoxes on March 20 and September 23 and weaken the magnetic field

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5494489/Huge-solar-storm-set-slam-Earth-TOMORROW.html#ixzz59hJL26Uw
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook



GO, HEALTH RANGER, GO!!! 
My lawyers just issued this demand to YouTube
Mike Adams
My legal team has issued a demand to YouTube: Show justification for banning The Health Ranger channel, or reinstate it.
Truth be told, they can't show any legitimate justification for banning it. That's because YouTube and Google are evil tyrants.
That's why I'm launching Real.Video in the coming months. The project is moving along rapidly, and it looks like we'll have it running by Summer. Go to that website now to request an invite.

DEFAMED... NOTHING BUT DOGS NIPPING AT ALEX'S HEELS ... SOMETIMES YOU HAVE TO KICK THEM AWAY... 




WHAT A LITTLE TURD-BRAIN, LIKE WE THE PEOPLE NEED TO BE TOLD WHAT TO THINK AND BELIEVE ... YEAH,  EVIL PROPAGANDA-CENSORSHIP IN THE EXTREME, IT'S HERE... KILL IT, KILL IT NOW!!! 

CEO SUSAN WOJCICKI TO ‘FIGHT CONSPIRACIES’ ON YOUTUBE BY ADDING WIKIPEDIA BOXES TO VIDEOS

Jimmy Wales and his army of liberal trolls will determine what's truth and anything which goes too far in countering the narrative will be banned or censored 


BRITAIN FIRST ... GOOD GOD, THE KOUGAR HOPES THE PEOPLE OF BRITANNIA RECLAIM THEIR RIGHTS, AND THEIR RIGHT TO BE BRITAIN'S FIRST ... IT'S SO SAD TO SEE THE GAWDAWFUL EU GLOBALISTS CONQUERING THEM... 

MORE CENSORSHIP: FACEBOOK BANS RIGHT-LEANING GROUP ‘BRITAIN FIRST’

'Political speech goes to heart of free expression...but political views can and should be expressed without hate,' says social media company

SO SAD TO WATCH WHAT IS HAPPENING IN EUROPE, AS WELL ... SCREAM ABOUT A HITLARIAN-COMMIE REGIME

EU: MORE CENSORSHIP TO “PROTECT” YOU

Globalists making their move to crush free speech 


MULTICULTURISM... SHOVE IT WHERE THE SUN DON'T SHINE, YOU COMMIE CREEPAZOIDS 

MEANWHILE, THIS HORROR IS STILL HAPPENING ... MUST WIPE THESE PEDO-KILLERS OUT WHOLESALE!!! ISN'T THERE A BIO-WEAPON THAT TARGETS PEDOPHILES??? THERE ARE BIO-WEAPONS FOR EVERYTHING AND EVERYONE ELSE NOW -- TO WIPE US OUT, AT WILL... 

UK GROOMING GANG VICTIMS SAY ‘ABUSE STILL HAPPENING’

Migrant rape gangs still operating in Telford


THE BEAR AIN'T KIDDING AROUND ... POKE HIS TOO MUCH, YOU JUST MIGHT LOSE A HAND ,,, OR BE EATEN WHOLE 

ARE THESE STORMS GEOENGINEERED??? JUST ASKIN' ... 

THE SUN IS TRANSFORMING AND BEING ATTACKED BY ENEMIES OF THE HUMAN RACE... THEY DON'T WANT TRUTH, JUSTICE, AND THE EARTH WAY INFECTING THEIR LITTLE TYRANNIES  

THIS IS FASCINATING, OF COURSE ... THE KOUGAR WISHES SHE HAD MORE TIME TO DEVOTE TO *ANCIENT HISTORY REVEALING ITSELF* 


FAST AND FURIOUS, TIME TO GET RID OF MAFIA-CRIMINAL HOLDER

STOPPING CHINA IN IT'S WORLD-CONQUERING TRACKS

REPORT: TRUMP TO UNVEIL MASSIVE ‘PACKAGE OF TARIFFS’ AGAINST CHINA

Trump is seeking “steep” tariffs against China for their alleged stealing of intellectual property and dumping of cheap, imported goods in the U.S.

SADISTIC CON MAN ... WHAT A MORE-THAN-DISGUSTING SHILL FOR THE NEW WORLD ORDER CRIMINALS ... AND YEP, THE BOMBS IN AUSTIN WERE SIMILAR TO THOSE MADE IN THE MIDDLE EAST 

CRAPAFORNIA...COMMIEFORNIA...CHINAFORNIA... MEXIFORNIA ... CIVIL WAR? 

http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/on-a-collision-course-for-civil-war-and-it-will-begin-in-california/#comment-140407

On a Collision Course for Civil War and It Will Begin In California
Over five years ago, I was chosen by two military sources to break the real story behind Benghazi and how close Obama came to being exposed byAmbassador Chris Stevens and two command military officers in the Middle East. Two military officers had conspired to rescue Stevens but were stopped and arrested and their careers were ruined.
I had no supporting evidence, other than what I was being told by two trusted and high-ranking sources. They grew very impatient with me because I sat on the story for 10 days. These two men were trying to accomplish what the 2 field commanders failed to do, which was to expose the abject criminality of Obama and Clinton. After 10 days of consternation I published the story and within 3 months, the story was validated by many. I am in a similar position at this very moment. And I learned a very valuable lesson 5 years ago, which is, don’t sit on a big story.
One of the biggest fears for a journalist stems from being proven wrong. And in stories like Benghazi and the story I am about ready to reveal, the events are so fluid that even if the early reports are accurate, the fluidity of the situation could lead to a totally different outcome and this could lead to a loss of credibility. In this instance, I say to hell with caution and it is time to tell the story that is coming from a trusted source. I will even name the source and I am beginning to get partial and fragmented confirmation from parallel events as well as other sources.
I want to be clear that I am asserting that a civil war could very well break out in California against what they call federal overreach. The participants, initially, will be California Democratic politicians, including Governor Jerry Brown. ISIS, MS-13, the Mexican government, China, former Obama administration officials are deeply involved along with George Soros. This series will appear to present some very outrageous claims. Therefore, I have decided to start with information that is mostly background to build the case that what I am being told is factual and America is about to enter a new  and dangerous era.

Will America’s Civil War Begin In California?

Last night, during my show, former CIA clandestine operative, Robert David Steele, was asked if Trump would have to resort to martial law in order to effect arrests and prosecution of the Deep State. Mr. Steele answered in the affirmative.
After The Common Sense Show aired on March 11, 2018, a trusted source, Paul Preston, called me as I was finishing dinner. He informed me tht he thought it was likely that Civil War II was going to begin in California and we would not have to wait long for this event to occur. Paul Preston is one on the primary leaders of the New California movement that is in process of creating a 51st state which is breaking away from “Commiefornia”.
New California has 40 counties in full support of this movement. They are breaking away from radical California government that believes they do not have to follow federal law and intend on breaking away from the US as an independent country. This has traditionally been known as the CALEXIT movement is fully endorsed by Governor Brown and most of the Democrats in the California Legislative Assembly. Also in support of the movement is China, the Mexican Consulate, the Mexican government, George Soros, various crime families in Asia as well as former key members of the Obama administration including Eric Holder (spokesperson), Loretta Lynch and closet support from the Clinton Foundation and the United Nations.
The lawlessness of California is off the charts. The unpunished murder of Kate Steinle by a several times deported illegal alien angered the country. Mayor Schaaf of Oakland obstructed justice when she warned illegal aliens that ICE was going to conduct a raid in Oakland. Here is the story behind Mayor Schaaf’s criminal actions.
Many Democratic state and local officials are in outright rebellion against federal immigration authority. In fact, on a national level many Democrats are proposing as part of the 2020 Democratic platform, that ICE be eliminated as a federal agency.
The Democrats in California have drawn a line in the sand and are defying federal authority. A showdown is coming and it is not going to be a show down resulting in civil disobedience, according to Paul Preston, members of Fox News and the leadership of the New California movement, this is civil war.

Phase One

I have warned, through this site, on several occasions that the unbridled admittance of MS-13 into the United States along with members of ISIS would constitute a 5th column which could bring both California and major parts of the United States to their knees. Here is a partial list of references in which I documented the dangerous presence of MS-13 on our soil in great numbers and the onslaught of their growth contines unabated.
I made this video about the continuing illegal immigration of MS-13 on January 24, 2018.
On August 1, 2017, I published a summary, with links that went back as far as 2010 to document the unwarranted presence of MS-13 in America. This article summarizes no less than 5 previous articles I have written on the subject. This is an excellent reference that traces much of the history of the terrorist invasion that has been going on our southern border for years.
MS-13, along with ISIS has been implicated in the Vegas Massacre and I documented this last fall:
Vegas Is Only the Beginning- This is Antifa Along with MS-13 and ISIS Sympathizers

CALEXIT: Open Rebellion Against the United State and the Planned Violent Overthrow of California

Unlike my Benghazi story, I have a lot of supporting documentation to support the fact that a civil war is coming and will start in California. The preparations are coming from both sides of the conflict.
On September 19, 2017, I reported the following:
According to Paul Preston, reports are circulating that numerous state legislators from California, including “California Senate pro tem Kevin de Leon), State representatives from Florida, Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, Utah and Colorado have been meeting with members of La Raza, the Mexican government (consulate), Mexican Mafia (“La EME”), California’s violent Mexican gangs (Nortenos /Sureños/ Sur 13), La Familia () and religious leaders (Catholic / Jesuits) to come up with a plan to separate from the United States as well as the above mentioned states”. Governor Brown, his aides, and the Bank of China have been in attendance in several of these meetings designed to sever California from the US. Further, The Common Sense Show has learned, independent of Paul Preston, that George Soros is bankrolling some of the costs associated with this movement. In addition to Soros, the United Nations and the Chinese government have had representatives at the CALEXIT meetings.
Paul Preston had an embedded sources at some of these meetings and the drug cartels along with MS-13 pledged “extreme violence” if CALEXIT was not successful. If one wonders how serious this movement is, consider the fact that CALEXIT opened an embassy in Moscow in 2017. The following is a picture of the CALEXIT embassy which was opened in Moscow.

Courtesy of Russia Today
On December 19, 2016, I published this video which covered the opening of the CALEXIT embassy in Moscow and an explanation of CALEXIT just as the movement was gaining steam.

Send In the 101st Airborne

There was a very telling article written by Mark Tapscott that appeared on Fox News’ Laura Ingraham’s site.  
In the article Tapscott interviewed Univesrity of Tennessee Law School professor, Glenn Harlan Reynolds. Reynolds asserts that New California is the old West Virginia. West Virginia became a state because Virginia declared its independence from the Union in 1861. Even more telling in article, Reynolds states taht Trump will likely have to send the 101st Airborne to California to quell the open rebellion.
As far back as January of 2017, Paul Preston and I publicly speculated that President Trump would have to send in the troops with tanks to California to meet the rebellion. When you visit the link, you will see that Youtube took down the related video which is almost as telling as the event itself.

Conclusion

It is at this point that the dots would be connected. However, in this instance, this plot is far to complicated to summarize at this point except to say that rogue California and former Obama cabinet Democrats, foreign influences and terrorists are preparing to unleash hold hell after standing up to President Trump over the immigration issue.
Also, indictments are being unsealed against the Deep State and this has accelerated the timeline for inevitable conflict.
The US military has been conducting urban warfare exercises in Phoenix. I have been told that they are primarily concerned with IED’s, this speaks to ISIS, attacks upon the public (MS-13 Vegas Massacre style) and snipers in tall buildings.
Paul Preston is in contact with very powerful people and when he called me last night, he made it clear he could not come on my show and he may not be talking to me for awhile given what he will be allowed to say.
In the next article, I will be introducing sequence of anticipated events who all will be involved and what the threat will be to every American.

For more stories like these, visit The Common Sense Show
THE MASSIVE LAS VEGAS COVER UP... 


WAYNE ALLYN ROOT=> The Vegas Massacre Exposé: What Really Happened?



What Really Happened in Vegas on October 1st? Was ISIS involved?
By Wayne Allyn Root
The Vegas Massacre is clearly the new “JFK Murder Conspiracy” updated for the 21st century. The whole story stinks to high heaven. It’s rancid. Clearly, our own government, FBI and Las Vegas police are involved in some sort of cover-up. The question is- what are they covering up?
Las Vegas is my home. I have the top radio talk show in this town. Many dozens of Vegas residents have gotten in touch with me to give me their take on the Vegas Massacre. Included in that group has been MGM employees, top MGM executives, survivors of the worst mass shooting in US history, as well as law enforcement and retired homicide detectives. From my own gut instincts, investigation and these interviews with key players, I’ve pieced together this story. It’s not a pretty picture.
Like any good detective, I have lots of working theories. A good detective doesn’t rule anything out. Maybe it really is as simple and clean as “Stephen Paddock did it, case closed.” But there are way too many unanswered questions, problems and mysteries with that storyline.
So here are my “Top 20” nagging questions, inconsistencies and theories about the Vegas Massacre…
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/03/wayne-allyn-root-vegas-massacre-expose-really-happened


Route 91 massacre survivor: I had seen some drones, and I thought it might be fireworks going off from a drone

Another eyewitness testifies he saw a some drones flying and 'fireworks going off from a drone' at the time fully-automatic gunfire hailed onto crowd goers


https://www.intellihub.com/route-91-massacre-survivor-i-had-seen-some-drones-and-i-thought-it-might-be-fireworks-going-off-from-a-drone


THANKS, GLOBALIST-PAID SOCIAL ENGINEERS FOR CREATING A GENERATION OF CRYBABIES 

http://allnewspipeline.com/Liberal_Dose_Of_Truth_NYT.php


March 10, 2018

NYT Liberals Triggered As Snowflake Staffers & Readers Are Ripped Out Of Their Safe Space And They Are NOT Happy 


ViewpointHorror.jpg

By Susan Duclos - All News PipeLine

The perpetually offended snowflakes on the left that claim they are all about "diversity," have now been triggered because the New York Times' editorial page editor, James Bennet, decided to hire anti-Trump conservative writers to offer "diversity," of opinion about political issues in their op-ed pages, to balance out the liberal lean of the paper itself.

NYT READERS WANT THEIR SAFE SPACE BACK!

We have been watching a cultural war play out over the last months at the New York Times, where the liberal writers and readers are bitterly complaining about Bennet's decision to offer viewpoints that do not conform to their liberal ideology. Offended employees  have leaked recordings of internal discussions to Huffington Post, while far left websites are whining about being yanked out of their safe spaces by seeing news about the "intolerant left," on college campuses attacking free speech, and how "collective victimhood" has become the norm for social justice warriors, just to name a couple op-ed NYT articles that have liberal website Slate declaring "Our bubbles have been popped. Now can we move on?"

We'll get to the articles that Slate is whining about in a minute, but first, in order to see the what liberals are finding the most offensive, we lok at Bennet's reasoning for wanting to offer "diversity" of opinion in the editorial pages.

According to the leaked video, which Huffington Post transcribed, Bennet said the following:

Most of our readers [inaudible] are liberal. I think if we show we take conservatives seriously and we take ideas seriously there, we get a lot more moderates paying attention to what The New York Times has to say. I think we lose the moderates completely if we just show that we think the conservatives are just, that there’s no point in even engaging their ideas or to debate with them.

If ANP readers think that is a reasonable assertion and goal, well, liberals vehemently disagree as that one quote is actually being called one of  "The Worst Parts of New York Times Opinion Editor James Bennet's Leaked Q&A With Staffers," as headlined, and quoted by the leftist website Splinter.

While the leaked transcript of the December 2017 meeting between Bennet and staffers, gives an overview first by Bennet on his vision of what he wants from the editorial pages, then a Q&A session after, the small portion of the from the beginning of his statement, is obviously the root of the issue with the subsequent complaints by progressives about the articles themselves stemming from the result of Bennet's vision.

James Bennet: So the op-ed page was created to do a bunch of different things. But it was partly because this other paper was going out of business, and the feeling — in this very New York-centric moment, The New York Times obviously was an entirely print-centric world — was, there’s nobody to keep us honest anymore. You know, we’ll take our positions and there’s nobody arguing the other side. And so the Times very deliberately went out to create a space in our own universe where there would be people taking the other side and where we would, again, be able to cover — and you can see this in the initial statement for the op-ed page — we engage with the culture, engage with a wide range of subjects. And that’s remained the goal of the page and the ecology of the opinion report over time. But what you’ve seen is the kind of regression to the mean, I think, that takes place. And in many ways we became more and more homogenous as the years went by. I mean, all the work was excellent. But I think a degree of sameness set in and to the point where it now — to grievously overstate the case, the idea of debate is, you have one guy for the Brookings Institution and one guy from the Council of Foreign Relations arguing in the page.

That ladies and gentlemen is why liberals hate Bennet. He created a virtual "free speech zone" on the NYT campus (the paper) where opinions that were not part of the liberal "bubble" could be represented.

triggerednytopeds.jpg

Which brings us to Slate's complaints about specific op-ed articles being allowed to be printed by the NYT. Slate titles their piece "Sweet Jesus, Will the NYT’s Conservatives Ever Write About Anything but the 'Intolerant Left' Ever Again?"

David Brooks published a column in the New York Times on Friday complaining about the manner in which '[s]tudents across the country,' having become obsessed with 'group identity,' are engaged in 'tribalism' and the oppression of dissenting viewpoints on campus.

That NYT article was titled "Understanding Student Mobbists."

The irony of the Slate writer complaining about the NYT  offering "dissenting viewpoints," by whining about an article detailing the oppression of "dissenting viewpoints" as his first example, seems to escape the writer.

In fact multiple examples used by Slate are articles highlighting the attack against free speech on college campuses and elsewhere, due to identity politics and the "victimhood" of social justices warriors, without understanding that those articles describe the exact mindset Slate is using by complaining about the NYT "free speech zone," meaning their editorial pages and op-eds.

Here is a list of articles that offends the Slate writer, along with his descriptions: (Note- Links to the NYT pieces will be Archive.is links, since NYT offers limited free articles before going behind a paywall)

• “We’re All Fascists Now,” Bari Weiss, March 7—a complaint that “leftists,” particularly “on campuses,” are attacking the ideals of “free speech.”

• “Free Speech and the Necessity of Discomfort,” Bret Stephens, Feb. 22—a complaint, delivered originally as a speech at the University of Michigan, about intolerant behavior by the “progressive left.”

• “On Venezuela, Where Are Liberals?”, Bret Stephens, Feb. 15*—a complaint that “campus activists” on “the left” are too forgiving of political repression abroad.

• “The Rise of the Amphibians,” David Brooks, Feb. 15—a complaint, in part, about society’s tendency toward conceptions of “tribal identity” that cultivate “mistrust, division and emotional frozenness.”

• “The Retreat to Tribalism,” David Brooks, Jan. 1—a complaint that “identity politics” fomented on campus are “tear[ing] a diverse nation apart.”

• “What’s Wrong With Radicalism,” David Brooks, Dec. 11—a complaint, in part, about “woke activists” on “the left” who are fixated on “identity.”

• “Mugabe and Other Leftist Heroes,” Bret Stephens, Nov. 17—a complaint that academics and others on “the left” are too forgiving of political repression abroad.

• “The Siege Mentality Problem,” David Brooks, Nov. 13—a complaint about the politics of “collective victimhood” espoused by, among others, “campus social justice warriors.”

• “America’s Best University President,” Bret Stephens, Oct. 20—a complaint that “the left” is assaulting “free speech” and creating an atmosphere of “Orwellian double-think” on too many campuses.

• “When Progressives Embrace Hate,” Bari Weiss, Aug. 1—a complaint that the organizers of the January 2017 Women’s March are too forgiving of, among other things, political repression abroad.

All issues Independent Media has been documenting consistently for years, finally being brought to the attention of NYT readers without the liberal spin and justifications for those behaviors, and the "progressive" left are NOT happy about it.

The Slate writer ends his piece with a little stomp of his foot and a demand that the paper "move on" and go back to being a safe space where he doesn't have to see or read about issues Conservatives find important:

When James Bennet and his defenders are asked why he keeps pumping this one type of take so relentlessly into the Discourse, they respond with answers in the vein of “It’s important to challenge readers with beliefs from ‘outside the bubble.’ ” So I’d like to say this, formally, on behalf of Times readers: Thank you for introducing the invigorating diversity of opinions about left/campus speech held by affluent Pennsylvania native and Columbia graduate Bari Weiss, affluent Pennsylvania native/University of Chicago graduate/Yale fellow David Brooks, Yale graduate James Bennet, and University of Chicago graduate Bret Stephens into our bubbles. Our bubbles have been popped. Now can we move on?

Slate is not alone, as other liberal sites are even more blunt and crude in their bitterness that their bastion of bubbled group-think has been invaded with *GASP* other points of view, as evidenced by liberal commentator Atrios over at Eschaton.

One reason they all keep writing these things is as a show of solidarity for each other. One (usually Bari or Bret) does something especially stupid and offensive, gets criticized, and then someone else writes a "I'll troll the libs too just to show them!" column, and then on and on and on and on.. As in, f*ck you, we write for the New York Times, you don't, and we'll never be fired and we can say what we want no matter how irrelevant or stupid.

Again with the irony.... displaying the exact hubris and intolerance that Bennet was addressing in hiring conservative writers to offer viewpoints from the "other side,"  by asserting any opinion that does not match their far left liberal ideology is therefore automatically "irrelevant or stupid."

NYT STAFFERS BECOME SNOWFLAKES

Liberal readers and websites are not the only ones whining about Bennet's push for more ideological balance, as NYT employees and liberal writers for the paper are also anonymously offering quotes and assessments about how they feel about allowing diverse opinions in the editorial pages, with Vanity Fair dramatically quoting one person as saying "The newsroom feels embarrassed," and Huffington Postquoting one employee saying Bennet's answers during that December meeting were "equivocal bullshit that didn’t really address that the opinion section abuses fact and elevates white male conservative voices under the guise of 'diversity of thought'."

ssbinkiebaby.jpg

The Federalist offers a suggestion to Bennet about holding just one, final meeting with the NYT employees, and some advice about what he should say:

“I thought I would stand here like this so you could see if I was really as big a sonuvabitch as you think I am.

Seriously, I have noticed that your internal criticism of me and a transcript from one of these meetings has been leaked to the HuffPost. Moreover, it appears that my efforts to communicate with you about what the Opinion section is and does have been judged to be ‘equivocal bulls–t.’ So I’ll stop equivocating.

I have a question for you: Do you hear laughter? Because I can hear it echoing down from a few blocks away at Fox News HQ.

It’s the laughter of Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity and yes, even Tomi Lahren. The monologues practically write themselves. The once hard-boiled journalists at The New York Times have outed themselves as a bunch of whining snowflakes, demanding that the newspaper of record become a safe space, free of any micro-aggressions that might trigger their precious, precious feelings.

It’s the laughter of all of those benighted rubes in flyover country watching Fox News and listening to their talk shows on their crappy AM stations. The laughter stings, because they’re absolutely right.


Read the entire piece because the points made throughout the piece are spot on.

BOTTOM LINE

The battle between the liberal snowflakes and the editorial page editor has made it to the pages of multiple other outlets. The criticisms and demands from the liberal snowflakes demanding the NYT once again be a place where conservative thought and opinion be banished so that readers and staffers can have their whole "campus" be a safe space free of any opinion that doesn't conform to theirs, is the perfect example of why Bennet's decision to offer ideological balance, even if just in the editorial pages for now, was exactly what needed to be done.

The fact that liberals and the NYT newsroom writers are complaining about conservative writers documenting the attempts of the intolerant left to suppress free speech they do not agree with, by displaying the exact same behavior and demanding the NYT suppress the free speech of those conservative writers, is the definition of insanity.

Even more disturbing is they don't even understand that they are proving the conservative NYT op-ed writers right.







NOTE TO READERS - If we make it through March when we start seeing the revenue generated by the new ad network, we may just have a chance to turn big techs' bias back against them and come through this stronger, louder and more powerful, together. February 2018 has been the most brutal month yet due to the censorship we have been battling against this past year, so any extra readers may be able to spare for donations is greatly appreciated.


DONATEANP1.jpg


THE REAL DRUG PUSHERS BEHIND BIG PHARMA'S ENGINEERED OPIOD EPIDEMIC

CONVICTED: DOC BRIBED $188,000 TO PUSH OPIOIDS

BigPharma is responsible for the opioid crisis 


WHEN ARE WE THE PEOPLE GOING TO TOPPLE BIG PHARMA TO SAVE OURSELVES, OUR FAMILIES, OUR FRIENDS, OUR VERY COUNTRY??? 
http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/using-the-pills-to-confiscate-the-guns 


Using the Pills to Confiscate the Guns
The correlation between psychiatric drugs and random acts of violence and homicide is well documented as the Food and Drug Administration requires black box warnings on the inserts of psychotropic drugs with regard to their relationship to violent behavior. Also, America has seen hundreds of cases where high profile acts of mass murder which were committed by individuals under the influence of psychiatric drugs.
Our nation is united in mourning over the tragic and needless loss of life at so many schools, theaters and malls. The latest mass murder spree in Florida is only one of a long line of mass killings in which the perpetrators was on psychotropic medication. But nobody is marching in the streets on psychotropic medication.
Our nation is also divided on how to minimize similar tragedies in the future. Both myself and many others have said that America should have armed guards in its schools in order to prevent the catastrophic and further loss of life. Many liberals disagree by stating that having guns in schools, in any form, is a very bad idea.
Former president Obama would have you believe that we need to ban guns when in fact we would be a lot safer if we banned psychotropic medication instead.

The Undeniable Link Between Psychotropic
Drugs and School Shootings

Our nation has been riddled with mass shootings in our schools dating over two decades. The correlation between psychotropic drugs and violent enacting behavior is unmistakable. Here is a partial list of psychotropically drugged individuals who have perpetrated gun violence in our public schools:
  • Patrick Purdy, 25, in 1989 opened fire on a school yard filled with children in Stockton,Calif. Five kids were killed and 30 wounded. He had been treated with Thorazine and Amitriptyline.
  • Steve Lieth of Chelsea, Mich., in 1993 walked into a school meeting and shot and killed the school superintendent, wounding two others, while on Prozac.
  • In Springfield, Oregon, on May 21, 1998, 15-year-old Kip Kinkel murdered his parents and then proceeded to school where he killed two and wounded 25. Kinkel had been taking the antidepressant Prozac. Kinkel had been attending anger management classes and was also under the care of a psychologist.
  • In April of 1999, near Notus, Idaho, 15-year-old Shawn Cooper fired two shotgun rounds in his school, narrowly missing students. He was taking a prescribed SSRI antidepressant and Ritalin. He also had been seeing a psychiatrist.
  • On the infamous date of April 20, 1999, at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado, 18-year-old Eric Harris and his accomplice, Dylan Klebold, killed 12 students and a teacher and also wounded 26 others before killing themselves. Harris was on the antidepressant Luvox. Klebold’s was probably on psychotropic medication but his medical records remain sealed, leaving the public to wonder what the government was hiding. Both shooters had been in anger-management classes and had undergone counseling. In the same familiar pattern, Harris had also been seeing a psychiatrist before the shooting.
  • In Conyers, Georgia, on May 20, 1999, 15-year-old T.J. Solomon was being treated with the stimulant Ritalin when he opened fire on and wounded six of his classmates. Ritalin is meth, pure and simple. How could any reasonable person expect a different result?
  • On March 7, 2001, in Williamsport, Pennsylvania, 14-year-old Elizabeth Bush was taking the antidepressant Prozac when she shot at fellow students, wounding one.
  • On March 22, 2001, at El Cajon, California, 18-year-old Jason Hoffman, while taking the antidepressants Celexa and Effexor, wounded three students and two teachers at his High School. He, too, had been seeing a psychiatrist before the shooting.
  • At Wahluke, Washington, on April 10, 2001, Sixteen-year-old Cory Baadsgaard held 23 classmates and a teacher hostage. He had been taking the antidepressant Effexor.
  • In Greenbush, New York, on February 10, 2004, a 16-year-old, Jon Romano, strolled into his high school in east Greenbush and opened fire with a shotgun. Romano had been taking medication for depression. He had also been seeing a psychiatrist.
  • At Red Lake, Minnesota,  in March 2005, 16-year-old Jeff Weise, while prescribed Prozac, shot and killed his grandparents, then went to his school where he killed seven students,  a teacher, and wounded seven before killing himself.
  • At Huntsville, Alabama, on  February 5, 2014, 15-year-old Hammad Memon shot and killed another Discover Middle School student Todd Brown. Memon had a history for being treated for both ADHD and depression. He was taking the antidepressant Zoloft. He, too, had been seeing a psychiatrist as well as a  psychologist.
  • In 2007, 18-year-old Finnish gunman Pekka-Eric Auvinen had been taking antidepressants before he killed eight people and wounded a dozen more at Jokela High School in southern Finland, then committed suicide.
  • In Cleveland, Ohio, on October 10, 2007, 14-year-old Asa Coon stormed through his school and shot and wounded four students before taking his life. Coon had been placed on the antidepressant Trazodone.
  • In Finland, in 2008, 22-year-old culinary student Matti Saari shot and killed 9 students and a teacher, and wounded another student, before killing himself. Saari was taking an SSRI and a benzodiazapine. Interestingly, he was also seeing a psychologist.
  • At Dekalb, IL., in 2012, 27-year-old Steven Kazmierczak shot and killed five people and wounded 21 others before killing himself in a Northern Illinois University auditorium. According to his girlfriend, he had recently been taking Prozac, Xanax and Ambien.  He had also been seeing a psychiatrist.
  • On November 20, 2014, 31-year-old Myron May, a Florida State University alum, opened fire in the school’s library, wounding three before he was shot and killed by police. ABC Action News found a half-filled prescription for the antianxiety drug Hydroxyzine in his apartment after the shooting. In addition, according to May’s friends, he had seen a psychologist and had been prescribed the antidepressant Wellbutrin and the ADHD drug Vyvanse. He also checked himself in to a mental health center called Mesilla Valley Hospital around September of 2014. Shortly after this, his friends discovered the antipsychotic Seroquel among his prescriptions.
  • In Seattle, Washington, June 5, 2014: 26-year-old Aaron Ybarra opened fire with a shotgun at Seattle Pacific University, killing one student and wounding two others. Ybarra planned to kill as many people as possible and then kill himself. In 2012, Ybarra reported that he had been prescribed the antidepressant Prozac and antipsychotic Risperdal. A report from his counselor in December of 2013 said that he was taking Prozac at the time and planned to continue to meet with his psychiatrist and therapist as needed.
  • In Milford, Connecticut, on April 25, 2014: 16-year-old Chris Plaskon stabbed Maren Sanchez, also 16, to death in a stairwell at Jonathan Law High School after she turned down his prom invitation. According to classmates and a former close friend, Chris was taking drugs for ADHD.
And there are 12 more instances since the Milford incident culminating with the Cruz mass killing in Florida. And yes, they were all on psychotropic medication.

A Much Deeper Agenda Than Protecting Our Children

Big Pharma makes big money and the more psychotropic medication, the more money they make. Big Pharma’s power is unchecked as they pushed through Universal Health Care, which they control. Big Pharma runs Congress and all the former presidents up to President Trump. But, they blocked Trump’s healthcare reform. And there is another agenda, Big Pharma wants to make money on the path to our demise.
You may be wondering what the connotation of the phrase “demise” means? It means that the government wants to take our guns and they are using psychotropic medication to further this end. This will be the first step towards our demise for millions of Americans because seventeen times in the 20th Century, gun confiscation preceded genocide against targeted groups. Big Pharma is cashing in as we move down this 1984 path to national suicide. The real culprit in school shootings, is our overmedicating with psychotropic pills with their causal link to violent enacting behavior. The immediate ban on psychotropic’s would do more to stem the tide of school violence than any other factor, outside of having armed guards in the schools. However, this would not serve the agenda of those who an ulterior motive for this country and its citizens.
Consider this, if one wants to disarm a populace who would fight against the tyranny current being established, the random murder of society’s most vulnerable victims is the best place to start in order build up a sympathetic backlash against the private ownership of guns. And if psychotropic medication has a causal link to violent enacting behavior, the criminals running the government merely have to sit back and use this preventable, drug-induced violence as a pretext to grab the citizens’ guns before martial law is implemented.
The government and Big Pharma are so intent on drugging the population, that there have been government mandated programs, such as Teen Screen and the New Freedoms Commission which mandated that nearly everyone should be on psychotropic medication. Fortunately, these programs fell apart because of a lack of support, but there are more of these programs being developed and waiting in the wings.
Through the former Presidents, George Bush and Barack Obama, the government has unleashed a modern day version of the mind control police in America by attacking the psychological well-being of America’s school children and veterans by forcibly incarcerating and seizing the guns of veterans who are not drinking from the globalists’ Kool-Aid.
There is an ongoing battle for the psychological health and welfare of America’s children and eventually all Americans, under the New Freedoms Commission (NFC), as it is the eventual intent to screen and treat, with mind numbing drugs, all Americans for mental illness by using criteria designed to elicit false positives. Even though the new Freedoms Commission was the original brainchild of Bush, the laws are still on the books. I do not believe Trump will initiate the final call to forcibly medicate the population, but his liberal (Democratic) successor will. Remember, this Executive Order remains in effect.
The relatively new mind control programs have commenced with the intent of compelling the mental health testing of all 52 million school children and the 6.5 million adults who walk through doors of every school in America on any given weekday. Acting under the authority of the NFC, all 50 states are mandated to implement compulsory mental health screening. The screening exams are to be administered in kindergarten, fourth and ninth grade. The screening program requires no parental notification and carries the force of law and this program continues unabated to this day. As is the case with vaccinations, the diagnosis and treatment, under the mind control policies of the Bush and Obama administrations will eventually be universal. The future potential for greater rates of violent enacting behavior cannot be overstated with the greater use of psychotropic medication which will accompany the continued implementation of this program.
Whether the root cause of school violence are the guns or the pills, anyone with the smallest degree of common sense would be advocating for armed guards in nations schools. The TSA is allowed to sexually denigrate and violate any air traveler on random basis and yet, the TSA has failed to stop even one act of terrorism in the history of the organization. Using the TSA as a model of intrusive imposition of policy designed to keep America safe, then why would we not move to proactively move to protect our school children to this threat? How can gun confiscation even considered to be a solution when we know that 90% of the guns used in a crime are stolen? Criminals will not turn in their guns. Gun free zones are where victims go to die because they are left defenseless by their government. And that is how the elite want it to be.

Pills Are More Dangerous Than Guns

The causal links have been established between the use of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and random acts of gun violence. The government should be banning the pills, not the guns. But even if Big Pharma gets a free pass from the government, why not still protect the children from violence by having armed personnel in our nation’s schools? After all, if our children’s lives are important enough to consider gun confiscation, then are they not important enough to protect from 8AM to 4PM on school grounds? Well, maybe not in the eyes of the government. I would ask you to click on the following link and read my analysis of the Aurora, CO., Batman shooting which was first published only a few short days after it transpired.
Fill in the blanks America, Ray Charles could see right through this agenda. The pills are merely a means to an end. There is clearly something much bigger at work here. It is a case of using the pills to get our guns. And why do the elite want our guns? For the same reason that any despotic regime seizes guns, so they cannot defend against the coming genocide.
For more stories like these, visit The Common Sense Show


COUNTRIES ARE TAKING THEIR GOLD PILES BACK ... GOOD IDEA ... LONDON IS LIKELY GOING TO BE SACRIFICED TO THE ALTAR OF TERRORISM, BIGTIME

HUNGARY REPATRIATES ALL ITS GOLD FROM LONDON FEARING ‘GEOPOLITICAL CRISIS’

100,000 ounces heading back to Budapest 


THESE ARE SOROS'S MINIONS, THOSE GUILTY OF SEX ABUSE ... THAT'S WHAT WE'RE BATTLING, BIG CATS BEAUTIES... 

No comments: