Monday big yowls and roars, most favored and frisky KitKats... yeah, this Big Cat is so sad... they are DELIBERATELY burning down Notre Dame, an obvious Tartarian building, a structure that is magnificently beautiful ... do the global-cabal monsters care? NO!!! They want to destroy anything that is majestically human, to murder our secret heritage -- to annihilate forever the GOOD SIDE of our culture... to forever DESTROY what we could create,build again for ALL OF US on planet Earth.
This HORROR-DESTRUCTION will not stand. Those responsible, everyone responsible for this BURNING DOWN OF *TARTARIA MAGNIFICENCE* will pay the ultimate price. They will pay for this terrible BETRAYAL OF HUMANITY, this BETRAYAL OF OUR NATURAL MAJESTY AS THE HUMAN RACE.
BY DIVINE DECREE, THIS REPREHENSIBLE ACT WILL BACKFIRE SO MONUMENTALLY, OUR WORLD WILL NEVER BE THE SAME. SO BE IT.
NOTRE DAME CATHEDRAL IN PARIS ON FIRE, WORKER CLAIMS IT WAS “DELIBERATELY” STARTED
Media reports claimed fire linked to “renovation” work
The famous Notre Dame cathedral in Paris is on fire, with one worker claiming that the blaze was deliberately set.
The roof of the historic building has completely collapsed.
https://www.infowars.com/notre-dame-cathedral-in-paris-on-fire-worker-claims-it-was-deliberately-started/IN DISHONOR OF TAX DAY ... ONCE AGAIN THE IRS IS ***UNCONSTITUTIONAL***
BERNIE'S AMERIKA, THROW A JOURNALIST OUT OF A PUBLIC TOWN HALL IN A PUBLIC VENUE ... YEAH, HE'S A REAL COMMIE FREAKTOID, ALRIGHT.
DIRT HAS MORE INNATE INTELLIGENCE THAN AOC
*Death* To the Unconstitutional Federal Reserve
April 13, 2019
Trump Prepares For Epic Battle In Cataclysmic Showdown That Will Change America
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers
A truly heart-stopping new Security Council (SC) report circulating in the Kremlin today states that the over $22 billion in retaliatory tariffs the European Union is about to slam on the United States is part of much larger globalist plot to bring down President Donald Trump being orchestrated by the US Federal Reserve and its Democrat Party socialist allies in the US House of Representatives intended to collapse the American economy by the 2020 US Presidential Election—but that Trump has armed himself against by cloaking himself with the protection afforded him by his US Attorney General William Barr who declared “Constitutionally, it is wrong to conceive of the President as simply the highest officer within the Executive Branch hierarchy…He alone is the Executive Branch”—thus setting the stage for an epic and cataclysmic showdown that will change America forever when Trump wields this power to abolish theFederal Reserve entirely. [Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]
According to this report, this past week saw one of the most bizarre political events ever occurring in American history when the entire Democrat Party membership of the US House of Representatives ignored every crisis their nation is facing and secluded themselves away from the media to attend a secretive conference—that on its opening day was headlined by a Hollywood elite singer named John Legend (who studied English with an emphasis on African-American literature) and his supermodel wife Chrissy Teigen (who dropped out of high school)—both of whom critiqued and blasted Trump’s tax and economic policies—and when asked what advice she’d give to House Democratic women, saw Teigen demonically replying “you should say fuck you more often”.
Going from bizarre to outright lunacy, this report continues, the roughly 170 leaders and lawmakers of the Democrat Party attending this secretive conference, who had previously held lessons on “how to talk to real people”, began their retreat with a “Who Are The People?” lesson given to them by elite Ivy League professors from Harvard and Yale universities—after which they took part in yoga and a celebrity-chef demo, with several members sharing a tee time at the golf course on-site—and then cut loose with a game of trivia, answering questions about Beyoncé’s fan base—one of many Democratic socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez easily got right---and which had a category titled the “Green New Deal” that was all about marijuana.
Best likened to when French Queen Marie Antoinette supposedly said upon her learning that her nation’s peoples were starving because they had no bread, “Let them eat cake”, this report notes, the blindness to their country’s problems exposed by these Democrats’ orgy of frivolities seemingly makes no sense—that is, until, one notes that the main intended focus of this conference was to hold a secret meeting between these Democrats and Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell—who, just weeks ago, had defiantly claimed: “no, Trump can’t fire me”.
The “intersection of battle” joined by President Trump, US House Democrats and Federal Reserve Chairman Powell, this report details, occurred on 2 March 2019—and was when the US Federal Debt Ceiling was reinstated—and upon its reinstatement, meant the US was already broke and having to use “extraordinary measures” to continue paying its debt obligations—but that by this Fall, it will no longer be able to do—thus meaning these Democrats must agree to raise this debt ceiling by at least August-2019—and if failing to do so, will crash not only the Americaneconomy, but the world’s, too.
To if the Democrats are actually willing to destroy the entire economy of their nation in order to throw President Trump from power in the 2020 US Presidential Election by their refusing to raise the US debt limit, this report warns, no one is in doubt of—as this master plan to defeat Trump has already been articulated by Democrat Party mega-donor, and Hollywood elite power broker Bill Mayer—who fanatically declared: “I feel like the bottom has to fall out at some point…and by the way, I'm hoping for it…because I think one way you get rid of Trump is a crashing economy…so, please, bring on the recession… sorry if that hurts people, but it's either root for a recession or you lose your democracy”.
Though the Democrat Party, along with its elite Hollywood and mainstream media establishment sycophants, continue inciting the American people with fears that President Trump is trying to destroy their nation’s democracy, this report explains, nothing could be further from the truth—as they fully know that the only threat Trump poses isn’t to democracy, but what is called the “administrative state” wherein all socialist power resides—and today is more commonly known as the “Deep State”.
To fully understand what the “administrative state” is, this report says, one must remember that for the first hundred or so years, the US federal government operated on the “spoils system”, whereby every government employee was effectively appointed directly or indirectly by the President, and as a result federal employees were routinely fired wholesale when an opposing party took office—thus the “spoils” of political warfare included the hundreds or thousands of government jobs that a new President could hand out to their supporters upon taking office.
In 1883, though, this report continues, the US Congress passed the Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act—which, among other things, made it harder for the President to fire most federal employees and created a distinction between rank-and-file civil servants and political appointees that serve at the pleasure of the President—and beginning in the 20th Century, the US Congressextended those protections to the heads of certain agencies as well, including the Federal Reserve.
The critical flaw in the Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act that created the “administrative state”, however, this report notes, is that it remains a gross violation of the US Constitution—that established a government of co-equal branches called the Executive, Legislative and Judicial—none of whom are allowed to interfere with or usurp the power of another branch.
With the Legislative Branch, therefore, clearly being in violation of the Executive Branch by dictating who it could, or couldn’t employ, this report says, this blatant power grab has only been able to survive due to the Judicial Branch joining with the Legislative Branch against the Executive Branch—but whose unholy alliance is now directly threatened by President Trump whose weapon to restore the full and rightful power of the Executive Branch is called the “Unitary Executive”.
Since 1974, when the socialist led Democrat Party and their leftist mainstream media allies engineered the downfall of Republican Party President Richard Nixon, this report further details, theRepublicans have masterminded a nearly 50-year long attack to retake Executive Branch power for the Presidency—but whose final assault could only take place when a rare constellation of conditions were met—US Federal Courts having more appointed Republicans than Democrats—the US Supreme Court having a Republican majority—the US Senate having a Republicanmajority (as they approve US Federal and Supreme Court judges)—the US Attorney General being an unwavering supporter of the Unitary Executive able to defend it—and, most importantly, a Republican President being in power to lead this war against the “administrative state” and destroy it.
With President Trump now being in power, Republican US Federal Judges now outnumbering socialist Democrat judges, the US Supreme Court is now in full Republican control, and the US Senate still flooding the US Federal Court system with Trump appointed judges, this report continues, this rare constellation of conditions joining together to destroy the “administrative state” gained its first in history Unitary Executive victory in June-2018 when the US Supreme Court ripped the power away from the US Congress to legislate whom the Executive Branch was able to hire to be administrative judges.
Completing this rare constellation of conditions to forever destroy the “administrative state” and restore rightful power to the Executive Branch, this report concludes, was President Trumpappointing the American constitutional scholar William Barr to be his Attorney General—whose sweeping views of the Unitary Executive maintains that Trump, and Trump alone, holds all power in the Executive Branch—Trump’s executive actions, orders and pronouncements cannot in any way whatsoever be usurped upon or overruled by either the Legislative Branch or Judicial Branch—Trump, and Trump alone, has full power to determine all foreign policy, declare national emergencies and start wars—and, if Trump so chooses, can not only fire Federal Reserve Chairman Powell, but abolish the unconstitutional Federal Reserve all together, as it’s part of the Executive Branch he has sole power over—thus explaining why today Russia has declared that “A New World Order Is Forming”.
April 13, 2019 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked back to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.
ALL POWER TO CLIVEN AND THE BUNDY FAMILY ... ALL POWER TO FREEDOM OF *WE THE PEOPLE*
Cliven Bundy to Appeal Lawsuit Judge Calls 'Delusional'
By Jennifer Yachnin
Greenwire
April 10, 2019
A Nevada state judge rebuffed rancher Cliven Bundy's latest bid to force the federal government to cede control of 56 million acres of public lands in the Silver State, characterizing the lawsuit as "simply delusional."
In an eight-page ruling, Nevada state Judge Jim Crockett rejected Bundy's assertion that only individual states — rather than the U.S. government — can own public lands.
"It is simply delusional to maintain that all public land within the boundaries of Nevada belongs to the State of Nevada," Crockett wrote in the decision dated April 1 and published yesterday.
Bundy's lawsuit had asked the court to declare all public lands within the state, including those lands surrounding his Bunkerville ranch where he grazed his cattle without federal permits for decades, as "property of the People of Nevada and Clark County."
But Crockett pointed to a trio of federal court rulings that have rejected Bundy's arguments against federal ownership of public lands.
"It is painfully obvious that the claims asserted by Bundy in the instant matter rest upon a fundamentally flawed notion advanced by Bundy since 1998 regarding ownership of federal public lands in Nevada," Crockett wrote.
Attorney Larry Klayman, who represents Bundy along with Nevada-based attorney Craig Mueller, told E&E News that his client will appeal the decision.
"We'll take it all the way to U.S. Supreme Court if necessary," Klayman said. "I don't understand why a judge would not want to protect the interests of the people of Clark County who own that land and not be in the hip pocket of the federal government."
Klayman also slammed Crockett's commentary in the ruling.
"The fact that he would make a statement and call my client 'delusional,' that is unnecessary," Klayman said. "A judge is to be respectful against litigants."
Klayman added that Crockett did not use similar language when he first made his ruling in oral remarks in a hearing at the Las Vegas court last month.
"He's playing to the crowd," Klayman asserted. "That is contrary to the code of judicial ethics. We have legitimate arguments. We were respectful to him. We would have hoped he had been respectful to us."
Klayman also questioned the judge's rejection of Bundy's case based on "preclusion," or the application of prior court rulings against Bundy's challenges to federal ownership of public lands.
"It's a new issue here," Klayman argued, pointing to the 2016 establishment of the Gold Butte National Monument near Mesquite, Nev., where some of Bundy's cattle graze.
But Center for Biological Diversity Executive Director Kierán Suckling praised the ruling, which was issued in response to a motion from the nonprofit. The environmental group intervened in the case on behalf of Clark County and the state of Nevada (E&E News PM, Jan. 24).
"The judge was being kind to call these claims delusional," Suckling said. "Bundy's ridiculous legal theories have wasted the court's time and taxpayer money. Hopefully this unequivocal ruling will encourage Bundy to finally pay his grazing fees and bring this nonsense to a close. I'm not holding my breath, though."
Bundy came to national prominence in 2014, when the Bureau of Land Management attempted to seize his cattle for auction to settle more than $1 million in unpaid grazing fines and trespass fees.
An armed standoff between supporters of the Nevada rancher — including anti-government advocates like the militia organization Three Percenters — and federal agents ensued, and BLM abandoned its efforts to seize the animals.
Bundy and his supporters, including several of his sons, faced criminal charges stemming from the incident, but a federal judge declared a mistrial in that case in 2017 after finding that prosecutors had withheld key evidence from the defendants.
Nevada Chief Judge Gloria Navarro also dismissed that case with prejudice, which bars federal prosecutors from bringing a new trial against Bundy.
Federal prosecutors have asked the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to reconsider that ruling (Greenwire, March 11). Bundy had argued his continued prosecution would violate the Constitution.
In court documents, federal prosecutors emphasize that Bundy continues to "unlawfully graze his cattle on federal land" (Greenwire, Feb. 7).
Bundy ended his grazing contracts with BLM in the early 1990s and has often described his decision to "fire" federal land managers.
Federal officials sued Bundy in 1998 over his subsequent nonpayment of grazing fees and won a judgment that required Bundy to pay a trespass fine of $200 per day per animal that remained grazing on federal lands after that decision.
But BLM officials have not attempted a new seizure of Bundy's cattle in the more than five years since the failed Bunkerville roundup.
The agency acknowledged in late 2017 that it was contemplating a new roundup but has not acted since that time. A spokeswoman did not immediately respond to requests for comment today (Greenwire, Nov. 20, 2017).
In an eight-page ruling, Nevada state Judge Jim Crockett rejected Bundy's assertion that only individual states — rather than the U.S. government — can own public lands.
"It is simply delusional to maintain that all public land within the boundaries of Nevada belongs to the State of Nevada," Crockett wrote in the decision dated April 1 and published yesterday.
Bundy's lawsuit had asked the court to declare all public lands within the state, including those lands surrounding his Bunkerville ranch where he grazed his cattle without federal permits for decades, as "property of the People of Nevada and Clark County."
But Crockett pointed to a trio of federal court rulings that have rejected Bundy's arguments against federal ownership of public lands.
"It is painfully obvious that the claims asserted by Bundy in the instant matter rest upon a fundamentally flawed notion advanced by Bundy since 1998 regarding ownership of federal public lands in Nevada," Crockett wrote.
Attorney Larry Klayman, who represents Bundy along with Nevada-based attorney Craig Mueller, told E&E News that his client will appeal the decision.
"We'll take it all the way to U.S. Supreme Court if necessary," Klayman said. "I don't understand why a judge would not want to protect the interests of the people of Clark County who own that land and not be in the hip pocket of the federal government."
Klayman also slammed Crockett's commentary in the ruling.
"The fact that he would make a statement and call my client 'delusional,' that is unnecessary," Klayman said. "A judge is to be respectful against litigants."
Klayman added that Crockett did not use similar language when he first made his ruling in oral remarks in a hearing at the Las Vegas court last month.
"He's playing to the crowd," Klayman asserted. "That is contrary to the code of judicial ethics. We have legitimate arguments. We were respectful to him. We would have hoped he had been respectful to us."
Klayman also questioned the judge's rejection of Bundy's case based on "preclusion," or the application of prior court rulings against Bundy's challenges to federal ownership of public lands.
"It's a new issue here," Klayman argued, pointing to the 2016 establishment of the Gold Butte National Monument near Mesquite, Nev., where some of Bundy's cattle graze.
But Center for Biological Diversity Executive Director Kierán Suckling praised the ruling, which was issued in response to a motion from the nonprofit. The environmental group intervened in the case on behalf of Clark County and the state of Nevada (E&E News PM, Jan. 24).
"The judge was being kind to call these claims delusional," Suckling said. "Bundy's ridiculous legal theories have wasted the court's time and taxpayer money. Hopefully this unequivocal ruling will encourage Bundy to finally pay his grazing fees and bring this nonsense to a close. I'm not holding my breath, though."
Bundy came to national prominence in 2014, when the Bureau of Land Management attempted to seize his cattle for auction to settle more than $1 million in unpaid grazing fines and trespass fees.
An armed standoff between supporters of the Nevada rancher — including anti-government advocates like the militia organization Three Percenters — and federal agents ensued, and BLM abandoned its efforts to seize the animals.
Bundy and his supporters, including several of his sons, faced criminal charges stemming from the incident, but a federal judge declared a mistrial in that case in 2017 after finding that prosecutors had withheld key evidence from the defendants.
Nevada Chief Judge Gloria Navarro also dismissed that case with prejudice, which bars federal prosecutors from bringing a new trial against Bundy.
Federal prosecutors have asked the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to reconsider that ruling (Greenwire, March 11). Bundy had argued his continued prosecution would violate the Constitution.
In court documents, federal prosecutors emphasize that Bundy continues to "unlawfully graze his cattle on federal land" (Greenwire, Feb. 7).
Bundy ended his grazing contracts with BLM in the early 1990s and has often described his decision to "fire" federal land managers.
Federal officials sued Bundy in 1998 over his subsequent nonpayment of grazing fees and won a judgment that required Bundy to pay a trespass fine of $200 per day per animal that remained grazing on federal lands after that decision.
But BLM officials have not attempted a new seizure of Bundy's cattle in the more than five years since the failed Bunkerville roundup.
The agency acknowledged in late 2017 that it was contemplating a new roundup but has not acted since that time. A spokeswoman did not immediately respond to requests for comment today (Greenwire, Nov. 20, 2017).
GO, CANDACE, GO!!! 1776 FREEDOM WORLDWIDE. NOW!
No comments:
Post a Comment