THE COMMUNIST THREAT IN AMERICA ... WELL, NOT EXACTLY...
Sunday yowls and growls, most adored KitKats ... okay, the world just gets stranger and weirder ... would you believe that *mind-blowingly* MCarthy pursued the 1947 UFO event in Roswell, New Mexico DURING those hearings??? You weren't taught that in school, were you? Yes, Dr. Joseph Farrell, intrepid and amazing researcher, is on the case, on a case that HE HAD NO IDEA AT THE TIME would take this bizarre twist and turn into UFO-1947 Landia... see the DARK JOURNALIST VID below.
And the new-old gold rush...
THE BATTLE OVER GOLD -- FOR GOLD-ECONOMIC FREEDOM -- TAKES FRONT AND CENTER ON THE WORLD STAGE ... THIS WILL BE BLOODY BEYOND BELIEF...
‘IT BELONGS TO THE PEOPLE, NOT THE BANKERS’: ITALY MOVES TO SEIZE GOLD FROM CENTRAL BANK
Italian populists seek to use gold to fund domestic policies
Two weeks ago, somewhat out of the blue, ECB President Mario Draghi issued an odd statement confirming that the European Central Bank needs to approve any operation in the foreign reserves of euro zone countries, including gold and large foreign currency holdings.
“The ECB shall approve both the operations in foreign reserve assets remaining with the NCBs (national central banks)…and Member States’ transactions with their foreign exchange working balances above a certain threshold,” [he said].
“The purpose of this competence is to ensure consistency with the exchange rate and monetary policy of the Union.”
Specifically, Draghi made this statement to two Italian members of the European Parliament.
At the time it did not seem notable for any reason other than its peculiar timing, but now things are starting to make more sense as The Wall Street Journal reports that Italy’s ruling populists pushed ahead this week with efforts to seize control of the central bank and its gold reserves.
https://www.infowars.com/it-belongs-to-the-people-not-the-bankers-italy-moves-to-seize-gold-from-central-bank
McCarthy, Monmouth, and the Deep State
Paperback: $21.95
Prints in 3-5 business days
DON'T WE HAVE ENOUGH CRIMINALS HERE ... DO WE NEED TO BRING IN MORE TO MURDER, STEAL, RUIN PEOPLE'S LIVES???
Trump Mocks US Refugee Program – “A Scam – Some of the Roughest People You’ve Ever Seen – Should be Fighting for UFC” (VIDEO)
President Trump spoke at the Republican Jewish Coalition on Saturday evening.
President Trump: And the asylum program is a scam. Some of the roughest people you’ve ever seen, people look like they should be fighting for the UFC. They read a little page given by lawyers who are all over the place. They tell em what to say. You look at this guy, you say, “Wow that’s a tough cookie!” (acting like refugee) “I am very fearful for my life. I am very worried that I may be accosted if I am sent back home.” No, no, he’ll do the accosting. Asylum, oh give asylum. He’s afraid.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/04/trump-mocks-calls-us-refugee-program-a-scam-some-of-the-roughest-people-youve-ever-seen-should-be-fighting-for-ufc-video
President Trump: And the asylum program is a scam. Some of the roughest people you’ve ever seen, people look like they should be fighting for the UFC. They read a little page given by lawyers who are all over the place. They tell em what to say. You look at this guy, you say, “Wow that’s a tough cookie!” (acting like refugee) “I am very fearful for my life. I am very worried that I may be accosted if I am sent back home.” No, no, he’ll do the accosting. Asylum, oh give asylum. He’s afraid.
LOTS OF NATURAL TECH INFO, PYRAMIDS, SCALAR ENERGY, ETC. ... AND SUPPRESSING THE RISE OF MAGICKAL-CONSCIOUS AWARENESS...
BEG, BORROW, STEAL THE CHILDREN
ONE OF THE BRAVEST JOURNALISTS EVER... SAVE JULIAN ASSANGE
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/04/exclusive-leaked-assange-court-transcript-sheds-light-on-us-backed-ecuadorian-expulsion-plans/
EXCLUSIVE: Leaked Assange Court Transcript Sheds Light on US-Backed Ecuadorian Expulsion Plans
The Gateway Pundit has exclusively obtained an court transcript of an appeal made by WikiLeaks publisher Julian Assange in an Ecuadorian court, in which the publisher accused the Ecuadorian government of preparing to revoke his political asylum at the behest of the United States and United Kingdom.
Assange has not been heard from in public since March 28, 2018 after an executive gag order by the government of Ecuador. The following, unpublished, “leaked” transcript of Assange asking an Ecuadorian court for an urgent injunction (“protection order”) against his gagging and isolation is from October 29, 2018.
Journalists and media were banned from recording the proceedings, but a court record was later obtained through legal process and provided to The Gateway Pundit. It has never before been revealed.
“I have been in this embassy without sunlight for six years and essentially isolated from most people for seven months and, including electronic communication, the telephone etc, from my young children,” Assange told the court.
“It has … interfered with my ability to work, to make a living, and with my deeply held principles that I have fought for all my life, which is to uphold the right of freedom of expression, the right for people to know, the right of the freedom of the press and the right for everyone to participate in their society and the broader society.”
Assange also told the Ecuadorian court that his gag order meant that he could not respond to false statements about himself.
“Due to my isolation, I have not been able to participate in the debates occurring around me and that has resulted in a climate of libel and fake news that might be expected for someone who has been in the business of exposing very large and very powerful corrupt organisations or organisations that abuse human rights.”
Assange also aid that members of the Ecuadorian Government had been involved in spreading information denigrating his character, something that he said saddened him given how proud he was of becoming an Ecuadorian citizen in 2017.
The publisher, who was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in 2019, went on to detail the importance of his work. He specifically highlighted his publication of US diplomatic cables which revealed hard truths about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
“There was no allegation that I had done anything other than what a journalist does, just that I have been a rather good one and effective one.”
The publisher stated that he did not apply for asylum at the embassy to live there. He applied so that he may go and live safely in Ecuador, but that the UK’s efforts to arrest him have made that impossible.
He went on to highlight the level of interference and security risks he faces at the Ecuadorian embassy in London, where he has claimed asylum for the past seven years. Assange spoke of signal jammers placed in the embassy to prevent him making phone calls, as well as repeated attempts by unknown persons to break through his windows at night. He said that someone had even attempted to breach the window the night before this very testimony.
“I am an assassination risk. It is not a joke. It is a serious business,” Assange said.
The WikiLeaks publisher explained that he had claimed asylum on Ecuadorian soil because the country “was a democracy, that it respected the rule of law, that it was not a totalitarian, arbitrary or dictatorial State.”
Assange also listed key areas of the Ecuadorian constitution to protest the government’s gag order against him:
“Article 16.2, which says “all persons have the right to universal access to information and communication technologies.”Article 66.2, which says “the following rights of persons are guaranteed: the right to voice one’s opinion and to express one’s thinking freely in all its forms and manifestations”.Article 20, which says “the State shall guarantee the confidentiality of journalists’ sources.”Article 41, which says “persons who have been granted asylum or sanctuary shall benefit from special protection, guaranteeing the full exercise of their rights” and that “the State shall respect and guarantee the principle of non-return,” meaning that refugees and asylum-claimants cannot be expelled.Article 79, which says “in no case shall the extradition of an Ecuadorian be granted.”(Assange became an Ecuadorian citizen in 2017).”
Assange went on to discuss how political changes in Ecuador had caused his asylum to come under threat.
“Due to various weaknesses in the Ecuadorian Government, namely the split – which I do not want to have any part of – within the Government’s Party, it has become weak and it has therefore started to lean on the United States and the UK for various kinds of support and this has caused an undue amount of influence by the United States,” said Assange.
The agitated the Attorney General of Ecuador, who was present at the hearing along with the presiding judge, “I have decided not to remain quiet, given the malicious and perverse insinuations about what Ecuador is doing, it has been influenced by foreign States.” He added that “Ecuador is a sovereign country.”
Last December the New York Times revealed the country’s president tried to sell Assange to the US for debt relief. Ecuador received $4.2 billion in a US backed IMF bailout on February 4. The US seeks Assange’s extradition over WikiLeaks’ 2010 publications on war and diplomacy. His alleged source, Chelsea Manning, was re-jailed last month to coerce her into a secret interrogation against him.
Assange’s testimony continued, and he asserted that the Ecuadorian Government is “positioning itself in order to violate the asylum.” He accused them of “deliberately leaking out to the press selective scandalous material” and gagging him so he cannot rebut the allegations.
“It’s all about setting the ground in order to violate the asylum, to hand me over to the United States. It’s come off the back of our March 2017 publication, the largest-ever in the history of the CIA, that resulted in many threats against WikiLeaks and, as of June this year, my alleged source Joshua Schulte, a CIA intelligence officer, was seized, put into prison, and they are trying to sentence him to 135 years,” Assange told the court.
“We know that Senators have written to [US Vice President] Mike Pence, telling him to tell President Moreno to hand me over.”
He noted that on June 28, US Vice President Mike Pence met with Ecuadorian President Lenin Moreno and that the White House publicly stated that “the Vice-President raised the issue of Mr Assange with President Moreno. It was a constructive conversation. They agreed to remain in close coordination on the potential next steps going forward.”
“This is what we are talking about. So let’s not play games here. The Ecuadorian State, for various political reasons, seeks to violate the law and conduct a public campaign in order to make it acceptable to hand over a persecuted journalist to the United States as a result of pressure, well-documented pressure, from the United States Government,” Assange asserted.
On Friday WikiLeaks revealed that two government sources said Mr. Assange’s expulsion would be in a matter of “hours or days” leading to a public backlash against the government and the intervention of two UN Special Rapporteurs.
In response, Ecuador’s ministry of Foreign Affairs, in menacing statement released at 3am this morning (GMT), stated that the revocation of asylum is a “sovereign act” but that his expulsion is not “imminent” — but declined to define what was meant by “imminent.”
In March 2018, the Ecuador’s President took effective control of most courts, removing judges at will, even from the nation’s Constitutional court. Mr. Assange’s judge did not grant the injunction.
Assange has been living in the embassy since 2012 when when he was granted asylum. On Thursday evening, WikiLeaks tweeted that a “high-level” source within the Ecuadorian state has informed the publisher that he will be expelled “within hours to days” over the INA papers offshore scandal as an excuse.
Ecuadorian President Lenin Moreno is currently being investigated by the National Assembly of Ecuador for corruption, based on the INA Papers leak.
“The INA Papers are a set of documents published in February 2019, allegedly uncovering the operations of INA Investment Corp, an offshore tax haven created by the brother of Ecuadorian President Lenin Moreno. The trove of emails, phone communications and expense receipts are said to link the president and his family to a series of corrupt and criminal dealings, including money laundering and offshore accounts. The leak has sparked a congressional investigation into President Moreno for corruption. Moreno can’t be summoned for a criminal probe while he remains president. He is currently being investigated and risks impeachment,” WikiLeaks reports.
Last Monday, this journalist visited Assange in the embassy and was locked in a room as an argument ensued between the publisher and Ecuador’s Ambassador Jaime Alberto Marchán.
Assange claimed that he was being treated as a prisoner, that they would not let him meet a journalist in a room that did not contain surveillance equipment, and that the Ecuadorian ambassador was acting as an agent of the US government.
Yet members of the US government believe Ecuador is in fact giving them what they want regarding Assange. A former senior State Department official told Buzzfeed in January, “as far as we’re concerned, he’s in jail.”
FULL TRANSCRIPT:
FROM INSIDE THE COMMUNIST-FASCIST BORG-LIKE EMPIRE... THE TRUTH...
China is 'threat to world' says dissident writer...
THEY WANT PEASANT-SLAVES, THE EVIL GLOBALISTS INVADE AMERICA WITH ILLEGAL-ALIEN HORDES AND DISEASE AND UNLIMITED POVERTY ... IS THIS WHAT YOU REALLY WANT?
MEDIEVAL DISEASES MAKING A COMEBACK DUE TO FECES ON STREETS
Experts warn of ‘public health crisis’
Medieval diseases are making a comeback in major American cities thanks to the increasing amount of feces on the streets.
According to a report by Kaiser Health News, “Infectious diseases – some that ravaged populations in the Middle Ages – are resurging in California and around the country, and are hitting homeless populations especially hard.”
Outbreaks of Shigella bacteria and Hepatitis A, both are which are caused by exposure to feces, are on the increase in Southern California, New Mexico, Ohio and Kentucky, “primarily among people who are homeless or use drugs.”
Experts are now warning of a “public health crisis” that could see the diseases spread to the general population.
https://www.infowars.com/medieval-diseases-making-a-comeback-due-to-feces-on-streetsREAL FREE MARKETS FOR PEOPLE WHO ACTUALLY VALUE REAL 1776 FREEDOM...
https://www.infowars.com/the-reasons-behind-the-relentless-ideological-onslaught-against-free-markets
THE REASONS BEHIND THE RELENTLESS IDEOLOGICAL ONSLAUGHT AGAINST FREE MARKETS
Human beings actually tend to gravitate toward free markets over and over again in history
I sometimes think that the free market concept is treated like The Hunchback of Notre-Dame’s Quasimodo in the long novel of global economic history.
It is considered ugly and undesirable by most people who judge it at a mere glance without bothering to understand it. It is a bogeyman; a scapegoat for numerous societal problems that it has nothing to do with. In reality, the only time free markets do cause trouble is when they are manipulated or misused by elitists seeking to turn them into something other than free markets. And, even when free markets display their great value and internal beauty, many still prefer other systems that are intrinsically corrupt but flashier on the surface.
There are many reasons behind this persistent attitude. However, they are not coincidental or natural. Human beings actually tend to gravitate toward free markets over and over again in history, and away from centralized government interference and dominance in economic trade. But whenever they do, they get hammered down by the-powers-that-be. In our modern era, establishment elites have chosen to be more subtle (for now) and dissuade people from free markets through disinformation and propaganda.
To break it all down to a simple observation –Whenever disaster strikes economically, free markets are blamed. Whenever something is fixed, even if that fix is a temporary band-aid on a sucking chest wound, government involvement and socialism are applauded.And so the cycle continues until free markets become a pariah with no place in our world and centralization becomes the prevailing answer to everything.
Free market trade is ever present at a local level and always has been. But, those who favor globalism are hell-bent on putting an end to any and all private unregulated commerce forever.
Before the increased lockdown in the 20th century, domestic trade in the U.S. was loosely regulated, if at all. The income tax didn’t exist, except for a trial run during the Civil War which was eventually repealed. There was no permanent central bank managed by unaccountable elites arbitrarily dictating interest rates or inflating the economy through asset purchases. Businesses were formed around partnerships which were limited in their scope, and while government grants and aid were afforded to some of these partnerships (as during the construction of the transcontinental railroad), these grants or bonds had an expiration date set for the moment the job was completed. At that point, the partnerships were dissolved and the company heads were expected to pay back the government on the grants given.
This is not to say that corruption in business did not exist pre-20th century; it certainly did. And in most cases this corruption was fueled by collusion between business moguls and government officials. Without the aid of government (the opposite of free markets) such criminal companies and monopolies cannot exist.
The suppression of free markets began in the aftermath of the Civil War and the passage of the 14th Amendment, which was intended to protect the citizenship rights of former slaves, but was instead used as a legal loophole by the elite to establish what we now know as “corporations”.
Corporations are defined by their corporate charter, which is granted by the government, as well as their “corporate personhood” derived from the exploitation of the 14th Amendment. Corporate personhood allowed for limited liability as well as many other government protections. Unlike partnerships, leaders of corporations cannot in many cases be prosecuted criminally and their personal assets are protected if those crimes were executed by “the company”. There are exceptions in history, but how often do you see corporate CEO’s prosecuted and suffer anything more than a slap on the wrist?
The company can be sued as a “legal person” in civil court, or fined by the government, but in general CEO’s and major shareholders are protected from any consequences, even if they were directly involved in the commission of a crime.
This relationship between government and corporations has become so egregious that today these monopolies receive special legal protections and immunity from some civil lawsuits, aid in the form of taxpayer funded welfare, massive tax cuts which smaller businesses and less connected corporations do not enjoy, and even central bank bailouts which keep them afloat. Major corporations are not allowed to fail, and no one is allowed to compete with them on a level playing field.
This is the exact antithesis to free markets. This is socialism. Yet many socialists point the finger at free market “capitalism” as the source of all our economic problems. This is impossible, because free markets on a level any higher than local trade do not exist today and have not existed for at least a century.
Another often misrepresented part of the free market mythos is that free markets are amoral creations that must be allowed to evolve without any oversight or conscience.This claim is sometimes made by a subset of people who say they are free market activists, but do not understand free markets in the slightest.
A soulless economic model is not what “Wealth of Nations” writer Adam Smith originally envisioned. Smith was a staunch advocate of an inherent moral compass as a guide for society. He was also highly distrustful of elitist philosophy, and saw it as a control mechanism designed to convince the public that their everyday experiences and instinctual judgments were “inadequate”; meaning, people should set aside their voice of conscience and let the system tell them what they should think and do.
What Smith asserted was that while people often act in their own best interest, they will generally do so while still adhering to a universal moral compass. They will seek success through hard work and endeavor (as they should be allowed to do), but the notion that people will naturally destroy everything and everyone around them in the process unless they are heavily governed is a propaganda argument with no basis in reality. This claim persists today and is still the primary argument used against freedom in trade.
There is a group of people that do behave in a destructive way automatically or instinctually when engaging in commerce without regulation, and these people have become a fascination of mine. They are narcissistic sociopaths; the defining characteristic of most financial and political elites.
I have outlined the facts surrounding narcissistic sociopaths in numerous articles, and I recommend readers study these for greater details. To summarize, full blown narcissistic sociopathy is a psychological aberration present in around 1% of any given population from birth. That is to say, in most cases these people are not created by their environment. Many of them come from very balanced and sheltered childhoods. They are born the way they are.
Narcissistic sociopaths are a tiny portion of the population, but lacking any sense of empathy or conscience, they account for a vast percentage of all crimes committed in society. They also gravitate to positions of power and influence from the business world to politics.
Most of the criticisms of Smith’s model for free markets revolve around the crimes of corporations (which are anti-free market) as well as the immoral behavior of narcissistic sociopaths. When one applies the free market idea to normal people, it works. When one applies it to narcissistic sociopaths, it doesn’t. My question is this – Is the best solution to remove free markets for everyone? Or, is the best solution to remove narcissistic sociopaths from positions of power and influence within free markets?
Establishment elites want us to believe that the former solution is the only solution, and with good reason. All centralization starts with economic centralization. Trade is the lifeblood of civilization, and if you can control the mechanisms of trade, you can potentially control an entire nation, or even the entire world. Free markets are a cure for the cancer of corporatism and socialism, and all they require is that people start participating in commerce without the consent or oversight of government. This is a difficult thing to stop when it gets started.
This is why the establishment is so obsessed with converting to a cashless society in which every transaction no matter how small is tracked and vetted. This is why governments are enacting harsher and harsher penalties for anyone doing business without their explicit approval. This is why government taxation and regulation is making small business ventures more difficult. And, it is why law enforcement officers are being encouraged by bureaucrats to write tickets punishing children selling lemonade on street corners. We are being conditioned to avoid attempting free market trade.
The final and most prolific attack on free markets is the use of the “greater enemy” and the “greater good” as props to undermine positive views of free markets. For example, a common argument against free markets relies on the idea that if people are allowed to pursue commerce unregulated, they would devour the Earth’s resources and destroy it in the process. While we have already seen some of the environmental damage done by the corporatocracy and the sociopathic people that control it, most of these crimes go unpunished despite considerable regulation.
How long have companies like Monsanto operated with impunity under the protection of government? Only recently in civil courts has this company finally had to pay for some of its crimes. But will a single Monsanto CEO or major shareholder go to jail for poisoning the ecosystem or giving people cancer? I doubt it.
The claim of the socialists and environmentalists that more government will save us from bad corporate practices is observably not true. Government and corporations work together to protect their fellow narcissistic sociopaths. More government means more corporate and elitist power. There is not a socialist nation on the planet that has not suffered this outcome.
I agree with Adam Smith in the idea that normal citizens will act to pursue success, but also to pursue balance. When given the opportunity to actually function within a true free market, most people are not going to destroy their surrounding environment and resources in some mad dash for gain. Why? Because it is in their self-interest not to. They know that if they abuse the structures around them they will lose their source of commerce. They know that if they ruin the system for others they will be shunned in business. They also know that if they fail in such a spectacular manner and commit criminal sabotage of the free market system they will have to suffer the regret and shame that will follow.
The only factor that this does not apply to are the elites themselves; the narcissistic sociopaths devoid of conscience with whom we now contend for our freedoms. I would suggest that Smith’s free markets, unshackled from centralization and government interference, would function almost perfectly if these people were cut from the equation entirely.
KOUGAR NOTE: YEP.
THE ONE WORLD RECIPE FOR GLOBAL SLAVERY IN THIS ARTICLE ... YEP, THE DIABOLICAL PUSH FOR WORLD ECONOMIC ENSLAVEMENT ... SAVE YOURSELVES!!! LOCAL ECONOMIES WORK BEST... YOU CAN ALWAYS WORK WITH ANOTHER COMMUNITY ECONOMICALLY...
https://www.infowars.com/it-begins-former-un-under-secretary-general-calls-for-one-world-currency
IT BEGINS: FORMER UN UNDER-SECRETARY-GENERAL CALLS FOR ONE WORLD CURRENCY
Globalists preparing final phase of New World Order’s economic plan
This year, the world commemorates the anniversaries of two key events in the development of the global monetary system. The first is the creation of the International Monetary Fund at the Bretton Woods conference 75 years ago. The second is the advent, 50 years ago, of the Special Drawing Right (SDR), the IMF’s global reserve asset.
When it introduced the SDR, the Fund hoped to make it “the principal reserve asset in the international monetary system.” This remains an unfulfilled ambition; indeed, the SDR is one of the most underused instruments of international cooperation. Nonetheless, better late than never: turning the SDR into a true global currency would yield several benefits for the world’s economy and monetary system.
The idea of a global currency is not new. Prior to the Bretton Woods negotiations, John Maynard Keynes suggested the “bancor” as the unit of account of his proposed International Clearing Union. In the 1960s, under the leadership of the Belgian-American economist Robert Triffin, other proposals emerged to address the growing problems created by the dual dollar-gold system that had been established at Bretton Woods. The system finally collapsed in 1971. As a result of those discussions, the IMF approved the SDR in 1967, and included it in its Articles of Agreement two years later.
Although the IMF’s issuance of SDRs resembles the creation of national money by central banks, the SDR fulfills only some of the functions of money. True, SDRs are a reserve asset, and thus a store of value. They are also the IMF’s unit of account. But only central banks – mainly in developing countries, though also in developed economies – and a few international institutions use SDRs as a means of exchange to pay each other.
The SDR has a number of basic advantages, not least that the IMF can use it as an instrument of international monetary policy in a global economic crisis. In 2009, for example, the IMF issued $250 billion in SDRs to help combat the downturn, following a proposal by the G20.
Most importantly, SDRs could also become the basic instrument to finance IMF programs. Until now, the Fund has relied mainly on quota (capital) increases and borrowing from member countries. But quotas have tended to lag behind global economic growth; the last increase was approved in 2010, but the US Congress agreed to it only in 2015. And loans from member countries, the IMF’s main source of new funds (particularly during crises), are not true multilateral instruments.
The best alternative would be to turn the IMF into an institution fully financed and managed in its own global currency – a proposal made several decades ago by Jacques Polak, then the Fund’s leading economist. One simple option would be to consider the SDRs that countries hold but have not used as “deposits” at the IMF, which the Fund can use to finance its lending to countries. This would require a change in the Articles of Agreement, because SDRs currently are not held in regular IMF accounts.
The Fund could then issue SDRs regularly or, better still, during crises, as in 2009. In the long term, the amount issued must be related to the demand for foreign-exchange reserves. Various economists and the IMF itself have estimated that the Fund could issue $200-300 billion in SDRs per year. Moreover, this would spread the financial benefits (seigniorage) of issuing the global currency across all countries. At present, these benefits accrue only to issuers of national or regional currencies that are used internationally – particularly the US dollar and the euro.
More active use of SDRs would also make the international monetary system more independent of US monetary policy. One of the major problems of the global monetary system is that the policy objectives of the US, as the issuer of the world’s main reserve currency, are not always consistent with overall stability in the system.
In any case, different national and regional currencies could continue to circulate alongside growing SDR reserves. And a new IMF “substitution account” would allow central banks to exchange their reserves for SDRs, as the US first proposed back in the 1970s.
SDRs could also potentially be used in private transactions and to denominate national bonds. But, as the IMF pointed out in its report to the Board in 2018, these “market SDRs,” which would turn the unit into fully-fledged money, are not essential for the reforms proposed here. Nor would SDRs need to be used as a unit of account outside the Fund.
The anniversaries of the IMF and the SDR in 2019 are causes for celebration. But they also represent an ideal opportunity to transform the SDR into a true global currency that would strengthen the international monetary system. Policymakers should seize it.
We are being primed and propagandized to desire this inevitability! Coming just a day after the Saudis threatened to end the Petrodollar, Ocampo’s op-ed is well-timed to say the least.
As we noted previously, nothing lasts forever
Alex Jones breaks down how the globalists are attempting to collapse civilization within the next six months by intensifying their migrant fueled destabilization of the west alongside the chemical castration of the population by targeting food, water, and air with toxic pollutants worldwide. Their goal is to cull the population down to an easily manipulated / controlled few under their technocracy.
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2834.htm
SORRY TO SAY, PLAGUES ABOUND... HERE'S ANOTHER ONE ... WHY? BECAUSE THE DAMN EVIL CABAL ARE DETERMINED TO KILL YOU AND ME OFF ... AND PEOPLE ARE JUST DAMN DUMB, THE ONES WHO GO ALONG WITH THE STUPIDITY OF DOING THESE KIND OF EXPERIMENTS ... REALLY??!!! WHO IN THEIR RIGHT MIND WOULD DO THIS EXCEPT MAD-SCIENTISTS TYPES, WHO ARE ESSENTIALLY MONUMENTALLY ***STUPID***
April 7, 2019
Mysterious “Creature From Black Lagoon” Space Disease Has Global Scientists Cowering In Abject Terror
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers
A seemingly ordinary at first glance Security Council (SC) report circulating in the Kremlin today became anything but mundane when its discussion minutes showed that the highest national security classification level “Of Special Importance” has now been placed on a Ministry of Health (MoH) scientific study dealing with a new species of fungus called Candida Auris—a mysterious fungal disease first detected in Japan in 2009 shortly after International Space Station astronaut Koichi Wakata visited his home nation—is now sweeping across the globe, has been labeled an “urgent threat” to humanity, is so “invasive and unbeatable”, confirmed cases and deaths have now been recorded in several European countries as well as in the United States, India, Pakistan,Venezuela, South Africa—and that Dr. Tom Chiller, the head of the US Centers for Disease Control Mycotic Diseases Branch, has just terrifyingly likened to “a creature from the black lagoon”. [Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]
According to this report, four weeks ago, on 6 March 2019, the Security Council authorized the Ministry of Health to release to the world scientific community a detailed analysis of a previously unknown outbreak of Candida Auris that occurred in a Moscow hospital in 2016-2017, and whose mortality rate was a shocking 42.1% of those infected.
The authorizing of this historic scientific information release from Russia to the world, this report explains, was due to findings discovered by the Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) that determined the most probable origin of this new Candida Auris disease sweeping across the globe was from the International Space Station.
In support of this assessment, this report details, SVR intelligence analysts noted that in February-2009, NASA astronaut-scientists aboard the International Space Station suddenly deployed a new device they’d developed to track down microscopic fungi and bacteria—an alarming development as the International Space Station had aboard it at the time two ancient and mysterious fungi species collected from the McMurdo Dry Valleys of Antarctica in Southern Victoria Land—that were launched into space in February-2008 and returned to Earth on 12 September 2009.
Most concerning to SVR intelligence analysts about the time frame the mysterious Antarctica fungi were aboard the International Space Station, this report continues, were the still unexplained travels and activities of NASA astronaut mission specialist Koichi Wakata—who was due to travel to the International Space Station on Expedition 18 scheduled to launch on 15 March 2009—but at the last moment was pulled from this launch for what NASA said was training on “new equipment”—his then being scheduled for Expedition 19 due to launch on 26 March 2009—but that was inexplicably scrubbed by NASA when they realized they’d have to use a Russian Soyuz spacecraft, which mandates a medical examination for all astronauts prior to liftoff—that, in turn, causedWakata, along with his full Expedition 19 crew, to be launched during Expedition 20 on 31 July 2009—and was an expedition that saw Wakata traveling to the International Space Stationaboard a NASA space shuttle, unlike other astronauts on this mission who used the Soyuz.
Though the exact mission and travels of NASA astronaut Koichi Wakata are more highly classified than this general report allows the reporting of, it does note his being in Japan shortly before the first case of Candida Auris was documented occurring there—that was followed by the Americans conducting a multi-year scientific effort to discover if fungi could survive in our Earth’s most upper atmosphere—the first results of which were released in August-2009 showing that fungal spores and other biological particles can account for large proportions of aerosol particle mass in pristine rainforest air as well as in rural and urban environments—and in the first study of its kind released in January-2013, discovered that there's a surprising amount of bacteria and fungi as high as 30,000 feet—and remarkably, these microbes could be affecting the climate, as well as contributing to the spread of diseases down on Earth.
With Russian scientists having already detailed to NASA how after the 1986 launch of the pristine MIR space station fungi and bacteria growth became unstoppable, this report states, it was no surprise that the mysterious ancient fungi discovered in Antarctica and sent to the International Space Station not only survived the brutal conditions of space, but also managed to reproduce—and whose greatest fears now suspected to be true is that this ancient fungi has spread to the exterior of the International Space Station where its spores from are now raining down on Earth.
Supporting these fears that Candida Auris fungi spores erupting from the exterior of the International Space Station are now entering our Earth’s atmosphere and altering our planets existing fungi species, this report continues, was genome sequencing testing that showed that there were four distinctive versions of the fungus, with differences so profound that they suggested that these strains had diverged thousands of years ago and emerged as resistant pathogens from harmless environmental strains in four different places at the same time—a finding so shocking, it caused CDC infectious disease expert Dr. Snigdha Vallabhaneni to fearfully in terror proclaim: “Somehow, it made a jump almost seemingly simultaneously all around the world, and seemed to spread and it is drug resistant, which is really mind-boggling”.
Most catastrophic and terrifying about the space borne Candida Auris fungi disease as it continues its deadly sweep across the globe, this report concludes, is that it’s truly unstoppable—and is why a “climate of secrecy” about its rapid spread now exists in the West—most particularly because it preys upon the sickest human beings found in hospitals and care facilities—all of which found infected have to be nearly completely destroyed—whose spread into the United States now shows doctors and nurses fearing to even enter the rooms of those infected, thus leaving their loved ones only left to care for them—and whose fearful strike into a community was, perhaps, best stated by Imperial College London infectious disease expert Dr. Johanna Rhodes, who grimly lamented upon it hitting her nation: “We have no idea where it’s coming from. We’ve never heard of it. It’s just spread like wildfire”.
Unstoppable Candida Auris space disease begins its deadly march across the United States
April 7, 2019 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked back to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.
ANOTHER WARNING...
MYSTERIOUS DRUG-RESISTANT GERM DEEMED AN “URGENT THREAT” IS QUIETLY SWEEPING THE GLOBE
"It’s pretty much unbeatable and difficult to identity."
THE EVIDENCE KEEPS PILING UP TO THE MOON ... CAGE THE HILDEBEAST NOW!
CONFIRMED… DNC WAS IN ON IT! Hillary Campaign Mgr. Was Pushing Fake Russia Story at DNC Convention – SAME DAY FBI Launched Trump-Russia Investigation!
A REAL AMERICAN HERO IN CONGRESS...
NEW ZEALAND, LAND OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER SLAVES...
THE ANDROID DOESN'T LIKE FREEDOM OF SPEECH...
No comments:
Post a Comment